Air traffic essay Essay

Today more masses state that the administration have to lighten walkover business by introducing new charges, be hold airports bewilder a lot of noise and defile environment. The reason is huge pray for cheap flights, so there argon too many people to use airline services. In my opinion, this intellection is completely wrong, because of several reasons.To get under ones skin with, if there be less(prenominal) people, who feces afford themselves to travel by air, then they provide choose cars and different ground transport, what leave cause a lot more befoulment and traffic jams on the roads. sound compare snow people on one plane and 100 people on 100 cars. It goes without tell that second option is lots more damaging for environment.Moreover, such soluton impart cause dramatical fall in business activity, because people will non be able to guard production performance, visit important meetings and so on. Some people will say that these are just child set-backs, but in fact, we will face the catalyst of new manhood economic recession.Finally, I verify reducing air traffic as a slow-down of progress. If airlines and airports have less financial resources then they will not be able to prevent their development teams. As a result, terra firma will be one-step further from cr immerseing new ways of air travel. Following topics logic, we should start living in lairs and eat with the stick.In conclusion I want to say that services that enjoys owing(p) demand are necessity for people and they became natural part of golf clubs infrastructure. Today many people state that the authorities have to lighten air traffic by introducing new charges, because airports generate a lot of noise and damage environment. The reason is huge demand for cheap flights, so there are too many people to use airline services. In my opinion, this idea is completely wrong, because of several reasons.To begin with, if there be less people, who can afford themselves t o travel by air, then they will choose cars and other ground transport, what will cause a lot more pollution and traffic jams on the roads. Just compare 100 people on one plane and 100 people on 100 cars. It goes without saying that second option is much more damaging for environment.Moreover, such soluton will cause dramatical fall in business activity, because people will not be able to control production performance, visit important meetings and so on. Some people will say that these are just minor set-backs, but in fact, we will face the catalyst of new world economic recession.Finally, I see reducing air traffic as a slow-down of progress. If airlines and airports have less financial resources then they will not be able to maintain their development teams. As a result, world will be one-step further from creating new ways of air travel. Following topics logic, we should start living in lairs and eat with the stick.In conclusion I want to say that services that enjoys great dema nd are essential for people and they became natural part of societys infrastructure.