Manville Corporation Fiber Glass Group Series Essay

1. Why take over Dr. shuttles comments precipitated a crisis?Because of the assumption apprehension is everything. Dr doll would have to manage the immediate crisis receivable to this c formerlypt. People will afraid of fibreglass from the importation they heard that fiberglass is likewise carcinogenic as asbestos scarce it is protrude less carcinogenic if compared with asbestos. The word asbestos which comes out(p) from Dr Dolls lip has created an cash dispenser of worry among the stakeholders and reporters who attended the symposium. This is because asbestos was once a worldly banned from manufacturing2. Does Manville have some other asbestos on its hands? In your judgment, who or what was responsible for the asbestos disaster?No, Manville has rattling not producing asbestos, It was the press or media to create an perception in public that fiberglass is actually a man- make out asbestos. Thanks you Dr Dolls comparison on asbestos and fiberglass, direct Manville is f acing with disaster. Manville should responsible since at that moment asbestos was actually a dangerous material to be used exclusively Manville or the asbestos manufacturer was keeping to conceal the fact. This bodily process was then cognise to the public and caused Manville to bring pressure from the stakeholder and filed for bankruptcy.3. What should Manvilles senior managers do in view of Andersons news? Be sure to consider the questa. Should they communicate with anyone? Who? What? How? When?Manvilles senior should held a meeting not only among the CEOs except excessively with its employee in order to argue the crisis. They give the gate plan to discuss about the solution to be used or suggestion which will return the justice of fiberglass to Manville. A communication naturalised is necessary in creating a link up and understanding between the workers and the superlative manager. Manvilles top manager should communicate as soon as possible once they heard of An dersons news since they have no much period to be wasted so that they can go on with other plan which is essential in rebuilding the reputation of Manville.b. Should they outstrip back or exit the fiberglass business?This decision should be made by depends on the circumstance but it is not arguable that information fly faster in modern days. The top level of Manville should expect that the news was known to public at the time they do a meeting in the morning. by and by on if they found that fiberglass is also giving less profit or the protest of public onto the production of fiberglass was too hard to be explained. therefore they are better to exit the fiberglass. however if the major problem was only on to the cost or salary problem, Manville could raise to scale back by expelling some employee who they think deserve to be fired but sometimes spunk might not the best focusing to ensure a companys survival instead it will make the company looks selfish.c. Should they char acterize the fiberglass MSDS or adjudicate? How?In terms of example and also business ethic they should modify MSDS. Previously, Manvilles MSDS only labeled itch-scratch, but actually it was believed that fiberglass is causing cancer, So Manville should add additional info into the label but at the same time this label maybe will makes consumer loath to purchase fiberglass product. Therefore ,Manville can only keeping MSDS but they could desire for some other way else to receive trust from the public towards fibreglass