Tennessee v. Garner 1985 Essay -- Supreme Court Decision Essays Case

NameTennessee v. Garner quoteNo. 83-1035, 83-1070 (1985)FactsOn October 3, 1974, Memphis Police Officers Hymon and Wright were dispatched to answer a prowler wrong call. When the police arrived at the scene, a neighbor gestured to the house where she had heard supply breaking and that someone was breaking into the house. While one of the officeholder radioed that they were on the scene, the other officer went to the rear of the house hearing a doorstep slam and saw someone run across the backyard. The suspect, Edward Garner halt at a 6-feet-high fence at the edge of the yard and proceeded to spring up the fence as the police officer called out police, halt. The police officer figured that if Garner made it over the fence he would pop out away and also figured that Garner was unarmed. Officer Hymon thus hired gun him, hitting him in the back of the head. In using harmful deplumate to prevent the escape of Garner, Hymon used the argument that actions were made under the all owance of the Tennessee statute and pursuant to Police Department constitution. Although the departments policy was slightly more restrictive than the statute it still allowed the use of deadly force in cases of burglary. Garners fathers argument was made that his parole was shot unconstitutionally because he was captured and shot possessing ten dollars that he had stolen and macrocosm unarmed showing no threat of danger to the officer. The incident was then reviewed by the Memphis Police Firearms Revie...